Editorial Policy
Last updated: November 4, 2026
This page describes the standards every article on Steady Natural Health is written to. If you find an article that falls short, email vungtrang2424@gmail.com and we will review it.
1. Our sources, in order of weight
Peer-reviewed human studies — randomized controlled trials first, then systematic reviews and meta-analyses, then observational studies. We link to PubMed or the journal.
Government and academic references — the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, the NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database, the FDA, the CDC, Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic and similar institutions.
Primary product documentation — the Supplement Facts label, the manufacturer's order page (for current prices and packages) and refund page (for the actual return rules).
Public customer records — Trustpilot, the Better Business Bureau, Reddit and marketplace reviews, which we report as anecdotes, never as evidence of effectiveness.
Animal and test-tube studies are reported as such and never presented as proof that something works in people. Marketing claims are reported as claims.
2. Fact-checking
Before publication every article is checked for:
every health claim having a cited source, and the source actually saying what we say it says;
prices, packages, shipping and refund terms matching the seller's page on the date stated in the article;
ingredient names, doses and strain designations matching the product label;
banned language — we do not use "cure," "guaranteed," "miracle," "FDA approved" (no supplement is), or "clinically proven" unless a trial on that exact product exists.
Articles that fail any check are not published until fixed.
3. Medical review
We are not medical professionals. We do not label articles "medically reviewed" unless a licensed clinician has reviewed them, in which case the reviewer's name and credentials appear on the article. Articles without that label have been fact-checked against published sources only.
4. How we rate products
Supplement reviews are scored on four things, in this order: the evidence behind the specific ingredients and doses; whether the label discloses doses or hides them in a proprietary blend; safety information and interactions; and value, including the real refund terms. We publish ratings as "evidence ratings," not satisfaction scores, and we say when a product has never been tested in a study.
A product we earn a commission on receives no advantage in rating or ranking. Where it ranks below a product we don't earn from, we say so.
5. Independence
Manufacturers do not see articles before publication and cannot pay for coverage or changes.
We do not accept free products in exchange for reviews. If we ever test a product ourselves, we buy it and we say so in the article.
Affiliate relationships are disclosed on every article that contains them. See the Affiliate Disclosure.
6. Corrections and updates
Every article shows its publication date and, when revised, an updated date. We update articles when prices, formulas or research change, and we correct factual errors as soon as we confirm them. Significant corrections are noted at the bottom of the article.
7. Readability
Our readers are mostly adults over 45 reading on a phone. We write in plain English at roughly an eighth-grade reading level, use short paragraphs, tables for comparisons, and large type. If an article is hard to read, that is our failure, not yours — tell us.
8. Use of AI tools
We use software, including AI tools, to help search the literature, organize research and check drafts. Every article is planned, reviewed and approved by a human editor, and every fact is traced to a cited source by a human before publication.
9. Contact
Editorial questions and corrections: vungtrang2424@gmail.com
